N-AERUS Annual Seminar
Paris, 15-17 May 2003


BEYOND THE NEO-LIBERAL CONSENSUS
ON URBAN DEVELOPMENT:
OTHER VOICES FROM EUROPE AND THE SOUTH

WORKSHOP PAPERS

WORKSHOP : HOME PAGE


Rutul Joshi
AN OVERVIEW OF URBAN SECTOR REFORMS IN INDIA: CHANGES IN THE PARADIGMS OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT

Download the draft paper in RTF format
Download the draft paper in PDF format

Abstract

The paper aims at understanding the urban sector reforms in India critically in the context of changing paradigms of urban development in externally financed projects. The paper will mainly focus on the State of Tamil Nadu in South India where the World Bank and other bilateral agencies have involved themselves over the last 25 years. The paper intends to put the series of urban development projects financed by the World Bank in the macro perspective of urban sector reforms in India as these projects have become 'best practices' in urban sector. Over the years, one observes a clear shift towards the neo-liberal paradigm of development which is integrated with the project design of the on-going project - Tamil Nadu Urban Development Project 2 (TNUDP 2). The project can only be seen in the context of urban sector reforms in India at various levels along with its history. This project has influenced the policies at the national and the state level to an extent of re-application of the same urban development model. The evolution of the project design of TNUDP 2 and critical analysis of the project confirms the view that the project needs to be looked at critically before it is replicated in the other parts of the country.


An Outline of the Paper
I intend to give an outline of the research paper not necessarily an abstract. Mainly because, I believe, that this form of representation of my paper will explain the paper more convincingly than in any other forms.
The Urban Reform Process in India
The prevalence of development assistance and foreign co-operations in the development projects, have been accelerated with the policies of economic liberalization in early 1990s. This has not only contributed to the polemics of development planning but it also has lead to certain processes of institutional and financial reforms within the existing system. The effectiveness and politics of development assistance has remained controversial subsequently, it has created debates amongst the bureaucrats as well as academicians.
New instruments of finances and public administration are being tried out not only in India but also in many developing countries globally in the name of sustenance of the economy and for the purpose of comprehensive development of the society. The economic liberalization in India and the appearance of international institutions in the development sector as the process-guiding mechanisms has lead to reforms at various levels of the nation-state, public finances and the role of the government. The perception of the global institutions is uniform for the developing parts of the World and concentrates on a development paradigm that is market friendly. Certain global policies based on these agendas are adopted for practicing in the developing world making the process of reform as a 'global process with local changes'.
Neo-liberal agenda and the prevailing reformism
The term 'neo-liberal' is generally interpreted as referring to the belief that the combination of democratic government, free markets, a dominant private sector and openness to trade is the recipe for prosperity and growth. However, John Williamson, who introduced the term, actually argues that markets will not deliver everything and that government must conjoin their commitments to free and open markets with recognition of responsibilities in the areas of health, education and poverty reduction. It is also recognized that market liberalization by itself is insufficient - it must go hand-in-hand with and perhaps even be preceded by, capacity building, market regulation and often more effective law enforcement.
Project financing viz. Policy-oriented lending
One of the major changes in the multilateral financial institution in the recent past is that of the change from 'project financing' to 'policy-oriented lending' in the urban sector. A review of on-going externally aided urban sector projects shows that majority of these are in the form of project financing, and do not have only structural impact and are also designed to bring about changes in urban sector institutions and urban sector policies and programs.
Such projects are designed to provide financial assistance to undertake development projects for targeted groups in specific cities. Example of policy oriented lending by multilateral and bilateral agencies are the Tamil Nadu Urban Development Project (TNUDP) funded by the World Bank and Financial Institutional Reforms and Expansion (FIRE-D) program funded by USAID.
While it may, as one of the several routes for Bank's engagement in the India's urban sector, serve a purpose of conveying the message that it was time to look beyond government for solving cities problems, the sector needs wide-spectrum intellectual support on such issues as market-based pricing system for non-tradable municipal infrastructure and services, regulatory mechanisms for private sector participation in urban development, State-municipal fiscal relations, and municipal accounting systems. These constitute a small sample of areas where urgent reforms are demanded by the Bank.
Externally aided urban projects - from physical intervention to financial intermediation to STRATEGIC (policy oriented) intermediation
Focusing on the development assistance in urban sector, one interesting trend is reflected from the project designs of the externally assisted urban development projects. The initial involvement of the Bank focused on physical intervention in the existing system. Later on the element of physical interventions started diluting more and more to an extent that these agencies not really involves themselves in the physical development but they facilitate other domestic and local agencies to implement the physical development.
After the liberalization and globalization of economy, the processes of decentralization, increased participation of private sector and communities in the planning process have been greatly emphasized. In this context, Tamil Nadu Urban Development Project 2 (TNUDP 2) appeared to promote private sector investment in urban infrastructure financing and the capacity building of the local bodies. The project design of TNUDP 2 reflects the market based approaches and the elements of neo-liberal paradigm of development. Tamil Nadu Urban Development Project (TNUDP 1) was a first step towards it, though carefully balanced between the governmental mechanisms and the market mechanisms.
TNUDP 2 is the 'third generation project' of externally assisted urban development project. The first generation projects like MUDP, CUDP and BUDP were more focused on physical intervention in the existing system focusing on shelter -sites and services. The second generation project like TNUDP 1 initiated the concept of financial intermediary and involved private sector in the urban processes. The third generation projects like TNUDP 2, GURP etc. not only promoted private sector participation but also added certain components like capacity building with the help of institutional strengthening. These institutions acted like Strategic intermediary facilitating the services beyond financing the projects. Thus, reforms are driven carefully ensuring the return of the investment along with visible changes within the institutional and policy framework.
COMPARISON OF INTER-GENERATIONAL URBAN DEVELOPMENT PROJECT DESIGN IN INDIA

Aspects of project design

First generation projects

Second generation projects

Third generation projects

Examples

MUDP 1 & 2 (1978-86)

Madras Urban Development Project

TNUDP 1(1988-97)

Tamil Nadu Urban Development Project 1

TNUDP 2 (1999-2004)

Tamil Nadu Urban Development Project 2

Cross Cutting Themes

Improvement of surrounding and quality of life

Financial and Functional Management of the 'urban'

“Building Institutions for Market”

Focus

Metro Cities

Metro and large cities, initiation of state level interventions

large cities, small and medium towns along with active state level interventions

Approach

Top-Down Approach, not significant involvement of communities

financial advisory services, Increasing community participation

Intermediation and consultancy, Participating Planning at micro level

Tools

Master plan, Area planning

Integrated Land Use -Transportation Planning and Finance and Operating Plans (FOPs)

City Corporate Plans (CCP), City Development Strategies

Institutional roles

Working with governments

Initiating Private sector participation in urban sector

Private sector participation at various levels

private sector involvement

Private sector exists depending completely upon the government

involvement of private sector in key area of service provision

Rhetoric of 'government as a facilitator'

Implementing agency

The government appoints the project implementing agencies, monitors and evaluates the project.

Government appoints Project management group which implement the project with other actors.

Government is still an implementer with wider involvement of private sector

Out comes

success in implementation but problems with sustainability and operation - maintenance

satisfactory implementation, likely sustainability but social/ environmental conflicts

Private sector participation works at micro level but no success at macro level. 

Policy Framework

Land ceiling, Rent control as evil acts, free hold tenure experiments

74th constitutional amendment act in 1992

Model urban local bodies act in case of TN, TNULB act of 1998

Project Priorities

Housing, Sites and Services, slum up gradation etc.

Infrastructure, civic amenities, transportation etc.

Infrastructure finance, capacity building, training, computerization


The financial success of TNUDP has encouraged the dialogue on the re-applicability of this model in other states. It is considered as a 'best practise' by the World Bank and the related organisations. Many of the urban development projects in India and in neighbouring country are influenced by it and have tried to incorporate some elements.
Future Directions of Urban Sector Reforms in India
The process of fiscal and function decentralization has been initiated in India and thus the concept of local self government with an active participation from various communities in the decision making can be made possible. The emergence of market based approach for urban services and for other provisions have to be critically checked by the government. There are great possibilities for the financial management, accounting system and taxation reforms to take place in the various parts of the country. Large no. of externally assisted projects are also going to focus of capacity building, training etc along with the building of physical infrastructure. The role of the government is going to be more crucial in regulating the service provision.

BACKGROUND PAPER

CALL FOR PAPERS

WORKSHOP PAPERS

CONTACTS



N-AERUS Annual workshop - Paris, 15-17 May 2003

N-AERUS: Network-Association of European Researchers on Urbanisation in the South
http://www.naerus.net